Corredor v. Alnamer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sexual orientation discrimination is considered a subset of sex discrimination for purposes of Title VII
• holding that courts may “consider substantial similarity” on a motion to dismiss where the two works are properly before the court
• recognizing that “it is well-settled that gender stereotyping violates Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination ‘because of . . . sex’”
• recognizing historic \consensus among our sister circuits\ foreclosing sexual orientation claims under Title VII, including Blum
• observing that attempts to distinguish Price Waterhouse amount to \semantic sleight[s] of hand ... not a defense ... a distraction\
• concluding “from the perspective of associational discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination—which is motivated by an employer’s opposition to romantic association between particular sexes—is discrimination based on the employee’s own sex”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).