Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 3/7/1977
Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency
Citations
- 370 A.2d 226
- 117 R.I. 647
- 1977 R.I. LEXIS 1735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a building that was over 200 years old, “contained features of apparent historical interest including wain-scotting, elaborate cornices, large fireplaces, and an unusual staircase” was unique
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bevilacqua, Joslin, Kelleher, Doris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency
15 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1972-08-22· cited 24×
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1974-06-05· cited 14×
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1969-05-02· cited 6×
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1970-10-15· cited 5×
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-05-13
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1972-09-26
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1973-03-15
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1973-04-19
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1976-05-13
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1970-01-12
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1971-05-03
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1972-11-13
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1972-11-13
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1973-02-20
- Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court· 1977-10-03
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.