Corpus Christi Firefighters' Retirement Sys. v. Macellum Capital Mgt., L.P.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1895
Syllabus
Where the question of standing was squarely before the trial court and fully briefed by both parties, the trial court erred in failing to determine whether appellant had standing to commence its action for an alleged violation of R.C. 1707.043 and instead addressed the merits of the action. Because we must remand the matter to the trial court to determine the question of standing, we do not reach the question of whether the trial court properly interpreted R.C. 1707.043.
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.