Corporate Air v. Edwards Jet Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in Montana, “[t]he construction and interpretation of a contract is a question of law” and “[w]here the language of a contract is unambiguous . . . the duty of the court is to apply the language as written”
• finding contract to be facially ambiguous, and thus summary judgment inappropriate, where provisions in the agreement were “susceptible to two reasonable but conflicting meanings.”
• “It is possible to allege several individual causes of action based on the same injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).