Coronet Foods, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coronet Foods, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the Board's use of a \projected earnings\ formula instead of a \replacement earnings\ formula
• noting that “[t]he Board may resolve any doubts against” the employer
• vacating restoration order because the company could not “simply restor[e] the prior operation but [rather would] be obliged to create an entirely restructured department”
• despite the fact that company violated Section 8(a)(3) by shutting down transportation facility, an order requiring company to restore the abolished department constituted an undue burden and therefore was invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).