Cornwell v. United States Department of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying request 25 for screening and noting that “the court performed its duty under § 1915A when it screened” plaintiff’s previous complaint
• “Screening of represented cases to decipher the allegations and claims is usually unnecessary.”
• addressing 8 defendants’ request the court screen plaintiffs second amended complaint and noting screening 9 orders are optional when plaintiffs proceed with counsel because counsel is held to Fed. R. Civ. 10 P. 11
• discussing lack of clarity on requirement for screening of 9 represented prisoner civil rights complaints, and practice of court not to do so given lack 10 of practical necessity for construction of counsel filed complaint and Rule 11 obligations 11 of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).