Cornwell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s motion alleging “the State had failed to prove a prima facie case” was “deficient to preserve the point on appeal”
• to satisfy the requirements of the contemporaneous objection rule, an objection must be specific enough to inform the judge of the alleged error and to preserve the issue for intelligent review on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jaggers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-20· cited 64×
• Romero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-27· cited 20×
• Hardman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-15· cited 5×
• Jefferson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 4×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-18· cited 2×
• Vathis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-12· cited 2×
• Rains v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-22· cited 1×
• Quintae Davouris Hudson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-14
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-30
• Elma v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Patterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-17· cited 12×
• Sanderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-22· cited 12×
• GWB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-01-21· cited 8×
• Ford v. Wainwright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-27· cited 1×