Cornwall v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding New York’s statutory interest rate of 9% and observing that even “though 9% is higher than market rates in the current economy, there is no constitutional mandate that the statutory interest rate follow market rates point for point”
• upholding New York’s statutory interest rate of 9% and observing that even “though 9% is higher than market rates in the current economy, there is no constitutional mandate that the statutory interest rate follow market rates point for point”
• “The New York statute providing for 9% prejudgment interest is not a violation of due process.”
• \Courts must interpret the contract to 'effectuate its plain language.' \ (quoting Seabury Constr. Corp. v. Jeffrey Chain Corp. , 289 F.3d 63 , 68 (2d Cir. 2002) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).