Corning v. East Oakland Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendants could not claim discretionary immunity for the removal of a stop sign where it was removed without their knowledge or authority
• holding defendants could not claim discretionary immunity for the removal of a stop sign where it was removed without their knowledge or authority
• holding section 3-104 does not apply to claims premised on a failure to maintain an existing traffic control device
• city’s failure to replace a missing stop sign was not an exercise of discretion under section 2-201 because there was no evidence the city was aware of it or made the decision to remove it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).