· 8/27/1986
Corning Glass Works v. United States International Trade Commission, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., Sumitomo Electric U.S.A., Inc., Intervenors
Citations
- 799 F.2d 1559
- 230 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 822
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20327
- 8 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the agency’s definitions must be “reasonable in light of the language, policies and legislative history of the statute”
- “The issue to be decided by this court is whether the statute is capable of more than one interpretation and whether the agency’s interpretation is reasonable.”
- respondent did not “refuse” or “was unable” to supply information within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(b) (1982) by responding that there was no data to provide.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nies, Bissell, Archer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.