Skip to main content
· 8/27/1986

Corning Glass Works v. United States International Trade Commission, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., Sumitomo Electric U.S.A., Inc., Intervenors

Citations

  • 799 F.2d 1559
  • 230 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 822
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20327
  • 8 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the agency’s definitions must be “reasonable in light of the language, policies and legislative history of the statute”
  • “The issue to be decided by this court is whether the statute is capable of more than one interpretation and whether the agency’s interpretation is reasonable.”
  • respondent did not “refuse” or “was unable” to supply information within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(b) (1982) by responding that there was no data to provide.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Bissell, Archer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.