· 8/7/1839
Cornier v. Sawyer
Citations
- 6 F. Cas. 583
- 1839 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if an accused is aware of the convening authority’s “personal interest” in a case and fails to object, the accused waives the issue
- holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
- holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
- issue of convening authority’s disqualification to refer case waived by knowing failure to raise it at court-martial
- “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”
- “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hopkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.