Skip to main content
· 8/7/1839

Cornier v. Sawyer

Citations

  • 6 F. Cas. 583
  • 1839 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if an accused is aware of the convening authority’s “personal interest” in a case and fails to object, the accused waives the issue
  • holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
  • holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
  • issue of convening authority’s disqualification to refer case waived by knowing failure to raise it at court-martial
  • “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”
  • “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hopkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.