Cornett v. Lark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, under the facts of that case, the defendant’s purchase of various keywords on Amazon [did] not create [consumer] confusion”
• “The likelihood of confusion is greater when an infringer uses the exact trademark.”
• “Ultimately, the affirmative defense of unclean hands requires the proponent to show that (1) the plaintiff’s wrongdoing is directly related to the claim, and (2) that the defendant was personally injured by the wrongdoing.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).