Cornett v. Cornett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing trial court's procedure of adopting various proposed findings by the parties without first making its own independent pronouncements
• stating trial court must first determine alimony and then, considering alimony as income, determine child support
• “[I]n citing the enhanced child support award as a basis to deny alimony the trial court has put the cart before the horse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-13· cited 24×
• Kingsbury v. Kingsbury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-14· cited 13×
• Kranz v. Kranz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-23· cited 9×
• Storey v. Storey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 5×
• Manas v. Manas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 4×
• Pike v. Pike
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-07· cited 3×
• Kelly v. Kelly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-25· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stock v. Stock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-16· cited 22×
• Staton v. Staton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-22· cited 20×