Cornett v. Buick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “Court only has jurisdiction” to declare a plaintiffs rights when doing so is “incidental and subordinate to” a money judgment
• noting that “Court only has jurisdiction” to declare a plaintiff’s rights when doing so is “incidental and subordinate to” a money judgment
• noting that “Court only has jurisdiction” to declare a plaintiff’s rights when doing so is “incidental and subordinate to” a money judgment
• stating that the court is to examine the “true nature of the action in determining the existence or not of jurisdiction” (citing Livingston v. Derwinski, 959 F.2d 224, 225 (Fed. Cir. 1992))
• “The mere fact that the equitable relief demanded has a monetary aspect to it does not deprive the District Court of jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).