Cornerstone SMR, Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that set-off is a pure question of law, with no deference given to the judgment of the trial court
• stating that “[w]hether the trial court awarded a proper set-off is a pure question of law”
• stating that “[w]hether the trial court awarded a proper set-off is a pure question of law”
• stating that set-off is a pure question of law, with no deference given to the judgment of the trial court
• stating that set off “is a pure question of law reviewed de novo, and ‘no deference is given to the judgment of the lower courts’” (quoting D’Angelo v. Fitzmaurice, 863 So. 2d 311, 314 (Fla. 2003)
• “Whether the trial court awarded a proper set-off is a pure question of law reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).