Second Circuit· 12/1/2011

Cornell v. Kirkpatrick

Citations

665 F.3d 369
2011 WL 5990653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that state’s consistent statement to the district court that petitioner had exhausted his particular claim, meant that on appeal, state could not then argue that petitioner had failed to exhaust that claim
holding that before considering a petitioner’s habeas corpus application, the Court must “determine if he exhausted all of his state remedies in pursuing his ineffective of assistance of counsel claims”
holding that overlooking favorable controlling precedent determining venue as a result of shoddy research was deficient representation where it was determinative of whether two sexual as- sault charges could be tried together
holding that state’s consistent statement to the district court that petitioner had exhausted his particular claim, meant that on appeal, state could not then argue that petitioner had failed to exhaust that claim
granting habeas relief only as to the “portion of the indictment” where venue was improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Cabranes, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.