Cornelius v. Nuvell Financial Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a result of the default, the averments contained in the Commission’s [Petition for Disciplinary Action] were deemed admitted, and we consider them as true under Rules 2-613(f) and 2-323(e).”
• “As a result of the default, the averments contained in the Commission’s [Petition for Disciplinary Action] were deemed admitted, and we consider them as true under Rules 2-613(f) and 2-323(e).”
• This Court held that an attorney’s failure to return the title to a client’s van, which had been furnished by the client to the attorney during the representation, “after the representation had concluded was a violation of his duty under M[A]RPC 1.15(a
• violation for lien on the client's marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).