Skip to main content
· 2/27/1987

Cornelius J. Minihan v. American Pharmaceutical Association

Citations

  • 812 F.2d 726
  • 259 U.S. App. D.C. 10
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 461
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Littell’s requirement of a “clear statement ]” in sustaining grant of summary judgment
  • it is well settled in the District of Columbia that in the absence of clearly expressed contrary intent, even though the parties speak in terms of permanent employment, the parties have in mind merely the ordinary contract for continuing employment that is terminable at will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Silberman, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.