Skip to main content

Cormier v. State

Citations

  • 955 S.W.2d 161
  • 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 5496
  • 1997 WL 656796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding under-Almanzathat appellant failed to show that egregious harm resulted from court’s failure to define reasonable doubt in punishment charge, without deciding whether court erred
  • deciding under Almanza that appellant failed to show that egregious harm resulted from court's failure to define reasonable doubt in punishment charge, without deciding whether court erred
  • applying Almanza “egregious harm” standard to failure to define “reasonable doubt” in instruction on burden of proof for extraneous offense evidence admitted during punishment phase
  • applying Almanza standard to failure to define \reasonable doubt\ in instruction on burden of proof for extraneous offense evidence admitted during punishment phase
  • applying Almanza \egregious harm\ standard to failure to define \reasonable doubt\ in instruction on burden of proof for extraneous offense evidence admitted during punishment phase
  • no evidence that defendant was harmed by absence of “reasonable-doubt” definition in punishment charge where definition present in guilt-innocence charge and punishment deliberations began less than 24 hours after guilt-innocence charge given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Jones, Kidd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.