Skip to main content
· 9/7/2023

Cormier v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating conviction of a participant in a public meeting for using gross and insulting obscenities
  • use of vulgar profanity as speaker at a school board meeting as being \a disorderly person\
  • use of vulgar profanity as speaker at a school board meeting as being “a disorderly person”
  • Mr. Chief Justice Burger, with whom Mr. Justice Blackmun and Mr. Justice Rehnquist join, dissenting
  • disorderly person to use indecent, profane, or offensive language in public place
  • remanding in light of Cohen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.