Skip to main content
· 9/30/1996

Corluka v. Bridgford Foods of Illinois, Inc.

Citations

  • 671 N.E.2d 814
  • 284 Ill. App. 3d 190
  • 219 Ill. Dec. 647
  • 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 379
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding common law claim for retaliatory discharge based on protected activity of reporting the sexual harassment of another employee was preempted by the Human Rights Act
  • finding common law claim for retaliatory discharge based on protected 12 1-06-2428 & 1-06-2928 Consolidated activity of reporting the sexual harassment of another employee was preempted by the Human Rights Act
  • retaliatory discharge claim preempted where the IHRA provided the legal duty prohibiting sexual harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tully

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.