Corie Hare v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under Sec. 8(a) of OSHA
• holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under Sec. 8(a) of OSHA
• holding that OSHA inspections were constitutionally permissible pursuant to administrative warrants based on less than criminal probable cause
• recognizing that search warrants may be “executed without delay and without prior notice, thereby preserving the element of surprise”
• holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under § 8(a) of OSHA
• holding that absent consent a warrant was constitutionally required in order to conduct administrative inspections under § 8(a) of OSHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).