Corey Wayne Chase v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “incorrect testimony resulting from confusion, mistake, or faulty memory” does not constitute perjury
• noting the Government's concession, in a post-Johnson case, to the application of the modified plain error standard
• applying clear error review to factual findings underlying trial court's decision to admit statement under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E)
• applying clear error review to factual finding underlying trial court’s decision to admit statement under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E)
• applying clear error review to factual findings underlying trial court’s decision to admit statement under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E)
• “Simple inaccuracies or inconsistencies in testimony do not rise to the level of perjury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).