Corey Thomas v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s use of the phrase “old timers” did not support inference of discriminatory motive
• holding that employer's use of the phrase \old timers\ did not support inference of discriminatory motive
• holding that employer’s use of the phrase “old timers” did not support an inference of discriminatory motive
• holding that different justifications for an adverse action is not sufficient to defeat summary judgment when those reasons are “not incompatible”
• holding that different justifications for an adverse action are not sufficient to defeat summary judgment when those reasons are “not incompatible”
• holding that even the presence of “shifting” justifications for an adverse action is not sufficient to defeat summary judgment when the justifications “are not incompatible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).