COREY LLEWELLYN TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute is not a sufficient written authorization
• \Nothing in section 6229(b) ... suggests a requirement that the necessary writing authorizing a person other than the tax matters partner to extend the period for assessment is limited to one specifically referring to a consent agreement under section 6229(b)(1)(B).\
• “Nothing in section 6229(b) ... suggests a requirement that the necessary writing authorizing a person other than the tax matters partner to extend the period for assessment is limited to one specifically referring to a consent agreement under section 6229(b)(1)(B).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).