Corey Bullock v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff’s failure-to-accommodate claim failed on a “fundamental level” where he did not request an accommodation
• holding that a plaintiff’s failure-to-accommodate claim failed on a “fundamental level” where he did not request an accommodation
• finding no direct evidence of discrimination because the speaker “was not the ultimate decisionmaker regarding termination”
• finding no direct evidence of discrimination where the speaker “was not the ultimate decisionmaker regarding termination”
• affirming summary judgment and noting that it is not the ultimate accuracy of the employer’s reason that matters, but only whether the employer believed in good faith that the employee engaged in the conduct leading to termination
• courts follow Americans with Disabilities Act caselaw when evaluating claims under the Texas Labor Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).