CoreSite 32 Ave. of the Ams., L.L.C. v. 32 Sixth Ave. Co. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \the state may not erect obstacles in the path of the unions' exercise of [their First Amendment rights]…\
• holding that the interest must be unique to the party seeking to intervene
• stating that, “[f|or our purposes, animus only invalidates a law when no rational basis exists”; adding that, “[a]s unfortunate as it may be, political favoritism is a frequent aspect of legislative action”
• explaining that a presumption of adequate representation arises when goals align
• explaining that a presumption of adequate representation arises when goals align
• acknowledging standard but not applying it because the state is not charged with protecting the First Amendment interests of the proposed intervenor state employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).