Corenbaum v. Lampkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the difference between gross charges and negotiated charges could suggest the existence of a collateral source payment in violation of the evidentiary aspect of the collateral source rule
• finding the insurer “negotiated and paid” 4 a lower amount than the full bill
• \[T]he full amount billed is not admissible for the purpose of ... proving noneconomic damages.\
• “Evidence of the amount that a medical provider accepted as full payment, pursuant to prior agreement, is relevant to the amount of damages for past medical expenses and 28 is admissible for that purpose, assuming it satisfies other rules of evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).