Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq. Kenneth Lee Danielle Lee Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an attorney “cannot assume that the claim will not be brought because he subjectively believes it is time barred or lacks merit”
• noting that “[w]hen an attorney has a basis to believe he has breached a professional duty, he has a reason to foresee that his conduct might be the basis of a professional liability claim against him”
• applying Selko two-part inquiry to an exclusion that eliminated coverage for “acts, errors, or omissions occurring prior to the effective date of the Policy if [the insured] knew or could have reasonably foreseen that they might be the basis of a claim.”
• “Only where the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ may the commencement of the limitation period be determined as a matter of law.”
• “When an attorney has a basis to believe he has breached a professional duty, he has a reason to foresee that his conduct might be the basis of a professional liability claim against him.”
• applying Selko test to exclusion in insurance policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).