Skip to main content
· 4/20/1995

Core-Vent Corporation v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

Citations

  • 53 F.3d 1252
  • 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1581
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9010
  • 1995 WL 240706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking only to decisions from the United States Court of Claims for applicable principles in resolving a dispute respecting the settlement of a patent infringement action
  • approving district court’s entry of a judgment interpreting and enforcing the parties’ oral settlement agreement after the parties failed to provide a written license detailing the terms outlined in the oral agreement
  • “Those who employ the judicial appellate process to attack a settlement through which controversy has been set to rest bear a properly heavy burden.”
  • “Those who employ the judicial appellate process to attack a settlement through which controversy has been set to rest bear a properly heavy burden.”
  • “Courts have inherent power sum- marily to enforce a settlement agreement with respect to an action pending before it.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Clevenger, Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.