Cordova v. Jolcover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “an address is not synonymous with usual place of abode. One has but one usual place of abode.”
• noting that even if the return was regular on its face, Cordova met his burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that he did not live with his wife at the dwelling where service was attempted
• reversing trial court and holding that defendant was not served at his “usual place of abode”; defendant submitted affidavits and other evidence replete with facts that he was not served at his usual place of abode
• “[A]n address is not synonymous with usual place of abode.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).