Cordova v. City of Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs section 1983 claim barred by Heck because it would “necessarily imply the invalidity of [plaintiffs] conviction under th[e] ordinance”
• \[T]here is no reason to believe a Nevada court would entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus [pursuant to NRS 34.360] from one who is no longer incarcerated or otherwise confined or restrained.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).