Skip to main content
· 3/5/1979

Cordes v. State

Citations

  • 265 Ark. 212
  • 577 S.W.2d 609
  • 1979 Ark. LEXIS 1327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, the trial judge acts as finder of fact, our duty is to make certain the proper standard was utilized by the court”
  • because adjudication under erroneous 4 standard of proof raised a question of whether juvenile, who had been adjudicated delinquent, was deprived of a fair trial, the case was remanded for application of the correct standard even though juvenile had not objected to incorrect standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.