Skip to main content

Cordero v. State

Citations

  • 296 Ga. 703
  • 770 S.E.2d 577
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “we adopted the ‘required evidence’ test for determining whether one crime is ‘included in’ another under OCGA § 16-1-6 (1) and therefore merges as a matter of fact”
  • “In Drinkard v. Walker, we adopted the ‘required evidence’ test for determining when one crime is ‘included in’ another under OCGA § 16-1-6 (1) and therefore merges as a matter of fact,” pursuant to OCGA § 16-1-7 (a) (1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.