Skip to main content
· 7/7/2008

Cordero v. Astrue

Citations

  • 574 F. Supp. 2d 373
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52711
  • 2008 WL 2485428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Motions to alter or amend judgments under Rule 59(e) and for reconsideration . . . are evaluated under the same standard.”
  • “Neither Rule 59(e) or Local Civil Rule 6.3 ... is an appropriate vehicle ... to advance new facts, issues, or arguments not previously presented to the court.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • denying motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule 59(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victor Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.