Skip to main content

Cordell v. Kent

Citations

  • 295 S.W. 404
  • 174 Ark. 503
  • 1927 Ark. LEXIS 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \the courts . . . will exhaust all the resources of interpretation before coming to the conclusion that there is an irreconcilable repugnancy between [acts passed in the same session] and that one repeals the other.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHaNEY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.