Cordary v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because Cordary was never transferred from the juvenile court to the district court, the district court never obtained subject matter jurisdiction and, thus, district court judgment of conviction was void
• holding that because Cordary was never transferred from the juvenile court to the district court, the district court never obtained subject matter jurisdiction and, thus, district court judgment of conviction was void
• “[A]s appellant was never transferred from the juvenile court to the district court as required by Article 2338-1, Section 6 and Article 30, V.A.P.C., she was never made subject to the jurisdiction of the district court.”
• “[A]s appellant was never transferred from the juvenile court to the district court as required by Article 2338-1, Section 6 and Article 30, V.A.P.C., she was never made subject to the jurisdiction of the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).