Skip to main content
· 8/18/1989

Cord Moving & Storage Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 17 Cl. Ct. 741
  • 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,699
  • 1989 U.S. Claims LEXIS 174
  • 1989 WL 94785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ALJ may not “select and discuss only that evidence that favors his ultimate conclusion”
  • stating that, court will not upset ALJ’s credibility determinations on appeal unless they are “patently wrong” because the ALJ “is in the best position to observe witnesses”
  • concluding that meaningful review of the ALJ’s decision could not occur because the court could not establish if substantial evidence supported the denial of benefits where the ALJ failed to mention an entire line of evidence in his decision
  • concluding that meaningful review of the ALJ’s decision could not occur because the court could not establish if substantial evidence supported the denial of benefits where the ALJ failed to mention an entire line of evidence in his decision
  • stating that an ALJ may not “select and discuss only that evidence that favors his ultimate conclusion”
  • noting that an ALJ may not “select and discuss only that evidence that favors his ultimate conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lydon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.