Corchado v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Administrative Law Judge neglected to ask [the claimant], as Avery requires, whether any of [the claimant’s pain] treatments had either alleviated his pain or caused any adverse side effects.”
• “Because the Administrative Law Judge did not adequately develop the record as to [the claimant’s] subjective complaints of disabling pain, her conclusion that [the claimant] has the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work is not supported by substantial evidence.”
• “Because the Administrative Law Judge did not adequately 17 develop the record as to [the claimant’s] subjective complaints of disabling pain, her conclusion that [the claimant] has the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work is not supported by substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).