CORBO PROPERTIES, LTD v. Seneca Ins. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant-insurer had reasonable justification in denying a claim based on the findings of independent investigators
• noting that the lack of evidence that the report was fraudulent or “otherwise unreliable” factored into the court’s conclusion that it was reasonable for defendants to conclude the fire was incendiary
• “[A]n ‘arbitrary and capricious’ denial is not reasonably justified; but a claim that is ‘fairly debatable’ would be reasonably justified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).