Corbitt v. Walters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a driveway was not curtilage for constitutional purposes where a car was in plain view within twenty feet of the road
• holding, based on the features of the driveway at issue there, the property did not constitute cur-tilage
• holding, based on the features of the driveway at issue there, the property did not constitute cur-tilage
• holding Commonwealth was not required to present defendant’s wife as a witness at suppression hearing to prove she consented to police officer’s entry into their home; the trial court has sole authority to make credibility determination of officer’s testimony
• citations arrest exists when criminality is one reasonable inference; it need not be Commonwealth v. Romero, 673 A.2d 374, 377 (Pa. Super. 1996) (emphasis in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).