Corbitt v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It was not until the recent decision by this Court in Smith v. State
• \The Crawford opinion focuses on the necessity of replacing the [Ohio v.] Roberts[
• holding that a juror who seemed \somewhat confused\ but who stated that she \could\ vote for the death penalty \`was clearly qualified to be seated as a juror under the Adams [v. Texas
• \Critical to the Court's decision[in United States v. Raddatz
• \Critical to the Court's decision[in United States v. Raddatz
• Fourth Amendment inapplicable where private party is \not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official.” (quoting Walter v. United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).