Corbett v. Beneficial Ohio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that United States citizens domiciled abroad “destroy diversity jurisdiction in any case to which they are a party”
• explaining that “a business trust . . . typically has a legal personality, conducts business in its own right, can sue or be sued, and generally operates like an unincorporated business entity”
• “Federal jurisdiction may not be asserted on the basis of diversity unless ‘the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.’”
• “Federal jurisdiction may not be asserted on the basis of diversity unless ‘the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.’”
• “Federal jurisdiction may not be asserted on the basis of diversity unless ‘the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).