Corbbins v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “substantive due process protects the liberty interests ov/y of persons affirmatively restrained by the United States from acting on their own behalf’
• holding that DeShaney 10 “applies equally in a suit against the United States, given the Supreme Court’s essentially identical 11 interpretations of the concept under the [Fifth and Fourteenth] [A]mendments”
• holding that 19 DeShaney “applies equally in a suit against the United States, given the Supreme Court’s 20 essentially identical interpretations of the concept under the [Fifth and Fourteenth] 21 [A]mendments”
• stating that \substantive due process pro- tects the liberty interests only of persons affirmatively restrained . . . from acting on their own behalf\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).