Coram v. Ingersoll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ommon sense suggests (and numerous decisions confirm) that an expert report that discloses new opinions is in no way a mere supplement to a prior report.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[P]laintiffs do not explain their failure to provide in a timely manner Gailor’s opinion that the brake pads suffered a defect in manufacturing. Thus, the first factor weighs in favor of preclusion of consideration of this opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).