CopyTele, Inc. v. E Ink Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concerning interrogatories, 7 “[b]oilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not 8 making any objection at all.”
• “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 expressly forbids a party from serving more than twenty-five interrogatories upon another party without leave of court or written stipulation.”
• “Boilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not making any objection at all.” (citations omitted)
• the party seeking additional interrogatories “was 8 expressly required to seek leave of Court before serving these interrogatories pursuant to Rule 9 33(a)”
• “Boilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not making any objection at all.”
• “Boilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not making any objection at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).