Copprue v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing instances where evidence that the defendant had been incarcerated did not impute bad character
• where this Court held that the identical videotaped interview should have been excluded because it constituted impermissible testimonial evidence
• where this Court held that the identical videotaped interview should have been excluded because it constituted impermissible testimonial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).