Coppock v. LUSTGRAAF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “since pleading in the alternative is permitted[,] [r]ecovery under [an] implied contract may be permitted, for example, where an express contract proves unenforceable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).