Skip to main content
· 2/24/1988

Copperweld Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 682 F. Supp. 552
  • 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 148
  • 12 C.I.T. 148
  • 1988 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute’s disjunctive structure signifies a congressional intent to give the agency broad discretion to analyze import volume in the context of the industry concerned
  • holding that the Commission is not required to consider injury to individual producers
  • holding no statutory provision requires ITC to use particular type of analysis to review lost sales
  • noting lack of any statutory provision -requiring ITC to perform any particular type of analysis of lost sales or revenue allegations
  • noting lack of any statutory provision requiring ITC to perform any particular type of analysis of lost sales or revenue allegations
  • The language of § 1677(4)(A) “defies the suggestion that the ITC must make a disaggregated analysis of material injuiy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.