Copper River Lumber Co. v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that interpretation of a rule of the FRCP “informs the Court's analysis” of the corresponding rule of the RCFC
• noting that interpretation of the FRCP “informs the Court’s analysis” of the corresponding RCFC
• observing that “interpretation of the [FRCP] informs the Court’s analysis” of the RCFC
• declining to impose a bad faith requirement for Rule 37 motions, “instead choosing to subsume it into the justification requirement in analyzing the explanation for the party's failure to disclose”
• “exclusion of evidence is an extreme sanction and should be applied only when lesser sanctions are inadequate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).